Il locus standi dei ricorrenti “non privilegiati” nella recente dialettica tra Tribunale e Corte di giustizia dell’Unione europea

The most recent developments in case-law relating to the definition of the locus standi of non-privileged applicants in actions for annulment of measures reveal a certain divergence in the interpretation adopted by the two European Union Courts. The different scope of the General Court’s and the Court of Justice’s judgments in each of the conditions for the admissibility of actions for annulment is likely to make the position of natural and legal persons even more onerous both in the definition of their legitimacy to act and in terms of restoring the coherence of the supranational legal order. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the most recent case law on the definition of the locus standi of non-privileged applicants through the perspective lens of the division of competences and the inter-organic balance within the EU judicial system.

di